Back to feed

Directly Responsible Individuals (DRI)

Simon Willison's Weblog

Jul 12, 2026

7/12/2026

Humans Should Remain Directly Responsible for Projects Even When Using AI Agents

Directly Responsible Individuals (DRI) · Simon Willison's Weblog

Law & Regulation · Jul 12, 2026

Responsibility for AI-enabled work is a governance boundary: even if LLM agents can perform tasks, they should not be DRIs—named humans must retain ultimate accountability for projects, decisions, and workflows, and product/process design should preserve visible human ownership.


7/12/2026

DRI Framework Requires Clear Human Ownership and Accountability for Autonomous Workflows

Directly Responsible Individuals (DRI) · Simon Willison's Weblog

Business, Finance & Industries · Jul 12, 2026

Applying the DRI framework to LLM agents means organizations must explicitly separate task ownership from execution by assigning a singular human owner (e.g., named approver, escalation path, accountable operator) for any consequential autonomous workflow, since agents cannot hold ultimate accountability—driving product design and market demand for AI that integrates with human accountability models.


7/12/2026

Agentic Workflows Should Separate Recommendation From Execution And Maintain Human Authority For Accountability

Directly Responsible Individuals (DRI) · Simon Willison's Weblog

Business, Finance & Industries · Jul 12, 2026

The text argues that AI agents should not hold managerial responsibility—systems that can't be held accountable mustn't make management decisions—and recommends separating recommendation/execution from formal authority while prioritizing human escalation, auditability, and sign-off in agentic workflows.