Back to feed

Build agents, not pipelines

seangoedecke.com RSS feed

May 31, 2026

5/31/2026

Architectures Share The Same Risk Surface And Safety Depends On Input Sanitization And Bounded Actions Not Pipeline Or Agent Choice

Build agents, not pipelines · seangoedecke.com RSS feed

Science, Technology & Innovation · May 31, 2026

The author argues pipelines are not inherently safer than agents: both face identical risks from untrusted human input and action-triggering outputs, so safety should focus on sanitizing inputs and hard-limiting tool/action affordances (e.g., constrained email tools) and on permissioning and review paths rather than on architecture choice.


5/31/2026

Agentic Systems Are Becoming The Default And Benefit More From LLM Improvements, Encouraging Agent-First Solutions Even For Marginal Tasks

Build agents, not pipelines · seangoedecke.com RSS feed

Science, Technology & Innovation · May 31, 2026

The document argues that agentic systems are becoming the default because model progress disproportionately benefits systems that delegate decisions to LLMs—evidenced by successful coding agents—and therefore builders/investors should favor agent-first designs for higher optionality despite greater near-term uncertainty.


5/31/2026

Pipelines Provide More Predictable Cost and Latency for High-Volume Inference Than Agent Loops

Build agents, not pipelines · seangoedecke.com RSS feed

Business, Finance & Industries · May 31, 2026

Pipelines win for large-scale production because bounded reasoning yields predictable, low-cost latency, while agentic loops introduce multiplicative runtime and cost risk—so separate cheap, bounded first-pass classification from expensive open-ended reasoning rather than exposing every request to unconstrained agents.


5/31/2026

Architectural Choice Depends On Task Adaptivity, Using Pipelines For One-Shot Tasks And Agents For Adaptive Iterative Work

Build agents, not pipelines · seangoedecke.com RSS feed

Science, Technology & Innovation · May 31, 2026

The decisive difference between LLM pipelines and agents is control-flow ownership—pipelines use pre-authored code-defined flows while agents let the model manage flow—which only matters for multi-step, context-limited, or reactive tasks where agents enable adaptive, iterative actions and pipelines suffice for one-shot, fixed-step workflows.


5/31/2026

Context Assembly Is The Binding Constraint And Agentic Retrieval Is More Effective Than Static Pipelines For Hard Problems

Build agents, not pipelines · seangoedecke.com RSS feed

Science, Technology & Innovation · May 31, 2026

The key point is that pipelines fail because assembling the right context (what data the LLM actually gets) is often the bottleneck, and agentic systems that fetch missing information beat RAG-style retrieval because finding relevant information is as hard as solving the task and embeddings/cosine similarity often can’t do it.